Bottlehead Forum Bottlehead Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Come see us February 11, 8-5 at the Head-Fi meet at the Burlingame Double Tree Hotel, Burlingame, CA. We'll be bringing lots of headphones and amps, and our prototype tube DAC used with our music server and the latest version of Amarra.

www.head-fi.org/t/584924/official-2012-bay-area-meet-thread-california-february-11th-saturday
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Quikie as unity gain buffer?  (Read 892 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jln
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: July 19, 2010, 02:19:35 PM »

What IS the Quickie gain, and is it practical to change component values to make a unity gain buffer amp?
I'm looking for a clean quiet inexpensive buffer to drive rather long (12') interconnects until I settle and fund a nice line stage.
Tx
jln
Logged
Paul Joppa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2010, 06:09:38 PM »

In stock form the nominal gain is 2.2 and the output impedance is 2000 ohms. Driving those numbers down with a smaller plate load will increase distortion substantially and I don't recommend it.

A 2:1 stepdown transformer would reduce gain to 1.1 and impedance to 500 ohms, which might be what you need.

A 1:1 transformer could be configured as a 2:1 autoformer and might do the job. But it would depend on the winding details - many such transformers are bifilar wound and would be quite unsuitable. Look for an electrostatic shield between windings or some claim of capacitive isolation. 600:600 ohm transformers are commonly available but many will not have enough inductance. You might have to experiment, since few if any transformers will be specified for this application. Ask Mike on the Magnequest forum; his "tapped choke" might fill the bill. It's not listed officially but is widely used - he may have coil stock on hand.
Logged

Paul Joppa
jln
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2010, 08:34:10 AM »

Thanks for taking the time to think this over.
As I feared this gets more complicated and expensive than I would like.
Perhaps it would still serve my purpose in the stock configuration with a gain of 2.2.
Logged
Caucasian Blackplate
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 498



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2010, 12:51:31 PM »

Add the Speco output transformers to the Quickie as described in the guide for headphone upgrades, just take the output off the orange wires instead of the red ones. 

This will add $15-20 to the cost of the preamp, not too bad really... 
Logged

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man
jln
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2010, 01:13:16 PM »

Not too bad at all.
I might give that a try.
What about adding an attenuator to Quikie? Is that feasible?
Many thanks,
jln

Add the Speco output transformers to the Quickie as described in the guide for headphone upgrades, just take the output off the orange wires instead of the red ones. 

This will add $15-20 to the cost of the preamp, not too bad really... 
Logged
JC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 486


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2010, 01:33:36 PM »

What do you intend to use as a source, and what will be at the other end of the interconnects?  It seems to me that the volume control will attenuate the signal pretty much to "0", while CB's suggestion of using the transformers will give you a good  output impedance to drive the interconnects.

I'm afraid I must be missing something.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2010, 01:38:32 PM by JC » Logged

Jim C.
Caucasian Blackplate
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 498



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2010, 08:38:55 PM »

What about adding an attenuator to Quikie? Is that feasible?
Many thanks,
jln



The Quickie comes with an attenuator.
Logged

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man
vanofmonks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2010, 05:30:51 AM »

Ask Mike on the Magnequest forum; his "tapped choke" might fill the bill. It's not listed officially but is widely used - he may have coil stock on hand.

Hi PJ, I have a nickel pinstripe tapped choke from MQ, so I will give this a try in the next week or 2 and let you guys know.

Chris
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!